Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1354

reference
977-tree-1
name
1354
tree-preservation-order

undefined

977-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.010024 50.853212)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009954 50.853204,-1.009957 50.853218,-1.009967 50.853231,-1.009982 50.853241,-1.010002 50.853247,-1.010024 50.853250,-1.010046 50.853248,-1.010066 50.853242,-1.010081 50.853232,-1.010092 50.853219,-1.010096 50.853205,-1.010092 50.853192,-1.010083 50.853179,-1.010067 50.853169,-1.010047 50.853162,-1.010026 50.853160,-1.010004 50.853162,-1.009984 50.853168,-1.009968 50.853178,-1.009957 50.853190,-1.009954 50.853204)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL